Thursday, October 30, 2008

On taxes, the wealthy, and spreading it all around

Join me, if you will, on a little anecdotal jaunt... On second thought, let me warn you that you may not want to. This could be painful or even maddening to you. Ok, if you aren't up to reading the tough stuff, just skip to the end.

There has been a lot of talk in the news lately about these implicitly selfish wealthy people and the weak middle class. Now I fit firmly within the middle class category, so nothing I write is from pure self-interest. But I have been thinking...

Most people by now surely have heard that the top 1% of taxpayers pay around 35% of all federal income taxes; the top 5% pay around 55% of the whole; the top 10% pay around 66%; and the top 25% pay around 84%. No matter on what the latest or most precise percentages are because the general idea is clear, and this post is all about general rules. They do, after all, become general rules because they generally are the rule.

There is no reason in the United States today that everyone cannot be a millionaire. Well, there is a reason, but I'll get to that later. The formula is very simple.

Like I said, I have been thinking. What makes rich people rich, middle class people middle class, and the "underprivileged" poor? In general terms, the same reason everyone is not a millionaire. Follow with me...

When wealthy people make lots and lots of money, what do they do with it? Let's see...they buy nice homes (except for Warren Buffet), they buy expensive cars (except for Sam Walton), they buy other stuff, they invest, they save, and they give. I notice their names on university buildings, hospitals, and church wings (for those churches that put names on wings). No, it seems the wealthy spread their wealth voluntarily to accomplish a number of charitable purposes. So why does the government need to get involved? And anyone in nonprofit work knows how most organizations are able to do extraordinary things because of the extraordinary generosity of a few, to whom much was given. Interesting.

So I'm curious, would raising taxes on the wealthy beyond the great amount they already pay be an attempt to shift those dollars away from charity to the government? Would the government be better at determining how to use those dollars for social good than the donors who actually earned the money? I am envisioning foreign countries I have visited. They have a "strong" middle class that relies on government to do and build everything. There are no names on hospitals or other "institutional" buildings. The wealthy are those in the government bureaucracy or with close ties and they don't do much charitable giving except with public money. Government is strong. Charity is weak. Okay, so that was admittedly a rant. But it's my blog and you had fair warning.

What about the middle class? What might we do with a raise, a bonus, or a tax refund check? Move toward becoming wealthy? WE PAY OFF DEBT, right? Now that is a great answer. But it begs the question, where did the debt come from? The answer to that question can often be found in another question. Why does the middle class stay the middle class over long stretches of time? Ouch. We stretched on the home purchase, filled it with nice furniture, kept up on the latest gadgetry, and entered the process of either leasing or making perpetual car payments. Middle class neighborhood are filled with all the stuff of wealthy neighborhoods but lack one fundamental similarity - the money to pay for it all. We have no savings, our giving is pathetic, and investing is out of the question.

This one could be touchy. The "underprivileged"? I have seen many people face insurmountable odds, but make wise choices, and press through to thrive. These were most often uneducated and certainly underprivileged folks. For example, most of our immigrant populations. And the Jewish communities that have faced persecution and discrimination that have thrived with little intervention. I recently heard of a local country club that opened up membership to Jews within the last 7 - 10 years. Astounding. Anyway, so what keeps poor people poor over long periods of time? And I could ask along with that, who has seen the greatest success in actually combating poverty in the United States - government or charity (so should we raise taxes or incentivize wealth and charitable giving)? When poor people receive a windfall, they rarely know exactly where it went, but certainly it is gone. It might go to the retail shopping outlet, a car dealership, or any number of places. I would venture to say it never goes to charitable giving, saving, or investing.

Poverty is a curse. The way to fight it is to get people out from under the curse, not to throw money at them. Studies have shown that if the world's wealth were evenly distributed, disparities would return within 6 years I believe. As the old proverb says, "A fool and his money are soon parted."

Thank you for letting me get all that off my chest. I feel better now.

Now for the reason everyone in America today is not a millionaire...

Yes, if you have read many of my posts you might have guessed it - BEHAVIOR - and that starts with you, not the government (not even the president).

So let me give you a little formula for success that I may have previously shared.

Give.
Save.
Then spend.


Or, as financial expert Ron Blue testified before Congress, "Live on less than you make. Then save and invest the difference over a long period of time."

You can do it. It is up to you. When your behavior follows these steps, mathematics takes over and abundance is automatically created. No matter who is president and no matter what the tax rates become, following these principles will naturally lead to wealth and success. And what do you do then (besides pay more taxes)? As Dave Ramsey says, "Once you have lived like no one else, you can live like no one else and you can give like no one else."

Don't wait on government. And don't worry too much about government (but DO get informed, think it through on your own - don't just listen to campaign rhetoric - and VOTE!). I could go on for hours, but I'll stop. Let me leave you with this verse that stretches out over this whole discussion-
"11Your power is great, and your glory is seen everywhere in heaven and on earth. You are king of the entire world, 12and you rule with strength and power. You make people rich and powerful and famous. 13We thank you, our God, and praise you. 14But why should we be happy that we have given you these gifts? They belong to you, and we have only given back what is already yours." 1 Chronicles 29:11 - 14 (Contemporary English Version)

Read it in several versions to let the truth get planted deep within you. And remember what my Dad told me right about this time of year in 1992: "That's why we put our trust in God instead of men." Wise words.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

I don't get out much

Last weekend, my wife and I had some time away. We stayed at a bed and breakfast on the Plaza, ate out, and shopped. It was a fun and refreshing weekend.

One thing we noticed was the lack of quality service at most of the stores in which we shopped. No smiles. No greeting. No expression at checkout.

Now admittedly, I don't get out much, so maybe this has become the norm. But back in the day when I frequented retail shops more often, I usually got friendlier service. Our innkeepers were excellent. Waiters and waitresses were great, but most of the retail service was lousy at best. Some of the people made no acknowledgement at all that we were present.

"So what is the point," you might ask. I reflected and prayed about this from a couple of angles that I wanted to pass on today.

How to respond to poor service:

Smile. Be kind. Be generous. Be gracious. Bring light into their day. You just never know what they are facing. (You could add many more things here)

How to give good service to others:

Smile. Be kind. Be generous. Be gracious. Bring light into their day. You just never know what they are facing. (You could add many more things here)

Yes, I'm aware the two answers are identical. No, it was not a copy-and-paste error. The two answers should be the same.

Treat others as you wish to be treated - no matter how they treat you and no matter the other circumstances you are facing. Wikipedia calls it the Ethic of Reciprocity. Others call it the Golden Rule. I call it the Word of God (see Matthew 7:12; Luke 6:31). Jesus said, "This is a summary of all that is taught in the law and the prophets."

Join me in considering how you are treating others in your life this week.